The tables are in the Neelsie now - had a few games on them & would like to share some thoughts.
First of all - the tables look amazing! definitely the coolest looking tables I've seen. Besides that I could really feel the advertising sinking in subliminally

. Seriously though, I think that any advertiser would love this kind of exposure. The tables are solid as can be, I think if you rolled them off a flight of stairs you could still play with them after. Also saw a lot of new players (as apparent by the amount of spinning) giving the tables a go which is good for the sport in the long run. From the viewpoint of a new player/advertiser/venue owner, it's a great idea and executed very well.
HOWEVER: anyone who is more experienced than a complete beginner at foosball will not like these tables. There are a LOT of issues with the playability and it's not just limited to the rods being stiff. A few notes:
- Rods are way too heavy, to the extent that playing on these tables is quite a workout!

- the balls are bad, too light, and their grooved shape makes it hard to do any kind of control. Forget about pinning the ball. Higher quality balls is probably the easiest way to make a major improvement in playability. Why not have 1 or 2 high quality balls in the tables rather that 9 crappy ones?
- the goal area needs some work - balls rolling laterally accross the goal tend to roll in without any way of stopping them (short of lifting the table)
- The reach of the 3-rod's side men is way to much (they reach to halfway across the goal!)
- there is about 3/4cm of space which the man on the 5-rod closest to the wall can't reach- this makes wallpasses stupidly easy and completely unblockable. It's all I'm going to be doing on my mid bar! 100% pass rate, ez!
- The tables are free play - which makes it hard to play pickups. i.e., if me and my friend go to play foosball, we'll generally challenge a table, by putting the R2 on the table. Having to pay for a game gives that game value, and puts a timer on the game rather than letting 2 people play indefinitely if they want to.
I can continue for quite a while with the table's problems as a player, but the point stands that accomplished players will not warm to these tables. If a venue I play at replace their tables with one of the Foozi tables, I will stop going there to foos - even though the foozi's are freeplay. You will DEFINITELY need a 'pro' version of your tables if you want to gain any kind of acceptance within the foosball community. I understand that this will increase the price of the tables - but, you can make them coin-op to compensate. I mentioned earlier the problems with a freeplay table in a bar/public environment. Still, I do see a large market for the freeplay, cheaper table, even if only to get people to START playing foos

I think you can still distribute your pro-version under the advertising model, with the coin-op income used to offset the cost of the table. At the end of the day you will still have your exposure for your advertiser, venue's will be happier to stock your table, and players will be happier with a table offering higher playability. I'm sure it won't be hard to find people to consult for what the tables need to be acceptable for competition play. I can even see Foozi tables, marketed properly, overtaking Garlando's as the official comp tables in SA, depending of course on the quality of the pro version.
Sorry if I came across a bit harsh, I am biased as a player though

. I'm looking forward to the tournament.. You can find me in the finals, I'll be the guy winning
